Subject	easy mid/low 11sec speed.your car is capable of 10's no prob
Posted by	twinz on January 31, 2001 at 9:18 AM
	This message has been viewed 12 times.
In Reply To	It ran a 122+ MPH (n/m) posted by Good2Zya on January 30, 2001 at 07:06 PM
Message	just need good hookup/60ft time. But I know your like me Fred, 1/4mi times dont really mean much except as a basic gauge of what the car is capable. Guaranteed the lambo/Porsche Turbo/viper GTS's that you can easily dust arent wondering what your 1/4mi stats are LOL. Anyone that think your car isnt "performing" as well as it should really doesnt understand what its all about. 122mph 1/4 is screaming fast for a street TTZ w/a 5spd. 1990 Twin Turbo 5spd Stillen Stage XI+ "No Show,All GO" 1999 Maxima SE 5spd ECZA member #0314 ..."If it doesnt make it faster, I dont care"...yellowZXTT
Follow Ups	SCC has a 539rwHP Z that only does 12.95. Seems slow 2 me. (n/m) - teahead 16:26:46 01/30/01 Same as Fred's ( SGP ), they took it easy,,LOL. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 16:35:47 01/30/01 that seems slow did thay push it the first half LOL (n/m) - NONE 16:43:13 01/30/01 that is really not that quick for that type of horespower - gtclk 17:07:31 01/30/01 Yes,I did have some wheel hop. I must address the suspension (n/m) - Good2Zya 19:15:11 01/30/01 I think he's talking about Fred's car in SCC (n/m) - wesman [92TT-less ] 18:10:51 01/30/01 I think you right, I was thinking White TT,,,,,,LOL. - ZBlacktt 22:36:38 01/30/01 Can you say "No traction" Look at the MPH for the real power (n/m) - TwinTurboPete 16:42:37 01/30/01 True 12.95 spinning is pretty quick. (n/m) - NONE 16:45:54 01/30/01 Yes, Fred's was still over 120 mph......@ 12+ sec. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 16:46:15 01/30/01 How can it have no traction?!?!?!?!?!? - NVMYZTT 17:53:24 01/30/01 You probably didnt have 530+RWHP>>>> - NONE 18:03:57 01/30/01 heh, take a look at my stg. 12+ that has all sortsa traction - Bernie 21:28:55 01/30/01 It's my Z NV, not their project car :) (n/m) - Good2Zya 19:09:22 01/30/01 MPH is the true measure of power. What was the speed trap? (n/m) - John Y(Houston) 16:43:49 01/30/01 not as much as some people think - Altered BeaZTT 17:00:06 01/30/01 Yep. - ZHOUND 17:14:59 01/30/01 YEP....I got - SteAmyZ(ztoyz.net©) 20:06:24 01/30/01 It ran a 122+ MPH (n/m) - Good2Zya 19:06:59 01/30/01 easy mid/low 11sec speed.your car is capable of 10's no prob - twinz 09:18:37 01/31/01 122.46mph. Not bad; for 539rwhp. (n/m) - teahead 11:42:59 01/31/01 That's my Z - Good2Zya 19:05:57 01/30/01 hey which issue is it in? i would love to see it >> - maverick (NYC) 09:17:41 01/31/01 From my experience...>>>>>>>>>>>>> - SpdRacr 19:15:01 01/30/01 Questions for Good2Zya and SpdRacr>>>>>> - NONE 19:28:31 01/30/01 Well........... - SpdRacr 19:40:59 01/30/01 Not incouraging but helpfull thanks. (n/m) - NONE 19:54:08 01/30/01 you might want to consider > - Kiwi_Z 20:18:17 01/30/01 Without SERIOUS rear end suspension work, Z's DO NOT hook up - BadZCar (FL) 21:47:50 01/30/01 Well, that's not quite true - Good2Zya 22:07:26 01/30/01 No mentioning of a clutch upgrade. It's probably an auto. - JamesPhotek (StL) 22:43:09 01/30/01 This Z, MY Z is a 5sp. And,if you would bother.. - Good2Zya 23:42:40 01/30/01 Re: This Z, MY Z is a 5sp. And,if you would bother.. - JamesPhotek (StL) 23:51:13 01/30/01 Very new to the forum ,,, I see,,LOL. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 09:05:52 01/31/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.